ax25-tools.git - Non-GUI tools used to configure an AX.25 enabled computer

	Commit message (Collapse)	Author	Age	Files	Lines
*	Split off doc files into ax25-tools-docs package.	Ralf Baechle	2013-06-04	1	-41/+19
\| \| \| \|	Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
*	Remove bogus removal of doc files.	Ralf Baechle	2013-06-04	1	-3/+0
\| \| \| \|	Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
*	Building an rpm requires mesa-libGLU-devel.	Ralf Baechle	2013-06-04	1	-0/+1
\| \| \| \|	Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
*	Move the X-based smdiag and man page into ax25-tools-x package.	Ralf Baechle	2011-06-25	1	-6/+51
\| \| \| \| \| \|	This means the installation of the plain ax25-tools package will no longer pull in tons of X libraries. This is useful on VMs or resource constrained hardware.
*	Split off X programs into a separate rpm package.	Ralf Baechle	2011-06-25	1	-5/+70
\| \| \| \| \|	This avoids lots of other packages being installed to satisfy dependencies when installing the ax25-tools rpm.
*	Add a build dependency to libXi-devel, fltk-devel to the rpm spec file	Ralf Baechle	2011-06-24	1	-1/+6
\| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \|	template. Without these packages installed everything will still build ok just xfhdlcchpar, xfhdlcst, xfsmdiag and xfsmmixer won't be built. In other words, these binaries are built optional and this is no error but as show by https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=545272 the behaviour is confusing and builders of an rpm probably want the whole thing.
*	Add support for building rpm packages.	Ralf Baechle	2009-06-27	1	-0/+82
	Now just a rpmbuild -ta <foo.tar.gz> will do.