summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/arch/sparc/kernel/semaphore.c
blob: c949717b4321b4145e649f809a49c17f6bc8af56 (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
/* $Id: semaphore.c,v 1.5 2000/12/29 10:35:05 anton Exp $ */

/* sparc32 semaphore implementation, based on i386 version */

#include <linux/sched.h>

#include <asm/semaphore.h>

/*
 * Semaphores are implemented using a two-way counter:
 * The "count" variable is decremented for each process
 * that tries to acquire the semaphore, while the "sleeping"
 * variable is a count of such acquires.
 *
 * Notably, the inline "up()" and "down()" functions can
 * efficiently test if they need to do any extra work (up
 * needs to do something only if count was negative before
 * the increment operation.
 *
 * "sleeping" and the contention routine ordering is
 * protected by the semaphore spinlock.
 *
 * Note that these functions are only called when there is
 * contention on the lock, and as such all this is the
 * "non-critical" part of the whole semaphore business. The
 * critical part is the inline stuff in <asm/semaphore.h>
 * where we want to avoid any extra jumps and calls.
 */

/*
 * Logic:
 *  - only on a boundary condition do we need to care. When we go
 *    from a negative count to a non-negative, we wake people up.
 *  - when we go from a non-negative count to a negative do we
 *    (a) synchronize with the "sleeper" count and (b) make sure
 *    that we're on the wakeup list before we synchronize so that
 *    we cannot lose wakeup events.
 */

void __up(struct semaphore *sem)
{
	wake_up(&sem->wait);
}

static spinlock_t semaphore_lock = SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED;

void __down(struct semaphore * sem)
{
	struct task_struct *tsk = current;
	DECLARE_WAITQUEUE(wait, tsk);
	tsk->state = TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE;
	add_wait_queue_exclusive(&sem->wait, &wait);

	spin_lock_irq(&semaphore_lock);
	sem->sleepers++;
	for (;;) {
		int sleepers = sem->sleepers;

		/*
		 * Add "everybody else" into it. They aren't
		 * playing, because we own the spinlock.
		 */
		if (!atomic_add_negative(sleepers - 1, &sem->count)) {
			sem->sleepers = 0;
			break;
		}
		sem->sleepers = 1;	/* us - see -1 above */
		spin_unlock_irq(&semaphore_lock);

		schedule();
		tsk->state = TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE;
		spin_lock_irq(&semaphore_lock);
	}
	spin_unlock_irq(&semaphore_lock);
	remove_wait_queue(&sem->wait, &wait);
	tsk->state = TASK_RUNNING;
	wake_up(&sem->wait);
}

int __down_interruptible(struct semaphore * sem)
{
	int retval = 0;
	struct task_struct *tsk = current;
	DECLARE_WAITQUEUE(wait, tsk);
	tsk->state = TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE;
	add_wait_queue_exclusive(&sem->wait, &wait);

	spin_lock_irq(&semaphore_lock);
	sem->sleepers ++;
	for (;;) {
		int sleepers = sem->sleepers;

		/*
		 * With signals pending, this turns into
		 * the trylock failure case - we won't be
		 * sleeping, and we* can't get the lock as
		 * it has contention. Just correct the count
		 * and exit.
		 */
		if (signal_pending(current)) {
			retval = -EINTR;
			sem->sleepers = 0;
			atomic_add(sleepers, &sem->count);
			break;
		}

		/*
		 * Add "everybody else" into it. They aren't
		 * playing, because we own the spinlock. The
		 * "-1" is because we're still hoping to get
		 * the lock.
		 */
		if (!atomic_add_negative(sleepers - 1, &sem->count)) {
			sem->sleepers = 0;
			break;
		}
		sem->sleepers = 1;	/* us - see -1 above */
		spin_unlock_irq(&semaphore_lock);

		schedule();
		tsk->state = TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE;
		spin_lock_irq(&semaphore_lock);
	}
	spin_unlock_irq(&semaphore_lock);
	tsk->state = TASK_RUNNING;
	remove_wait_queue(&sem->wait, &wait);
	wake_up(&sem->wait);
	return retval;
}

/*
 * Trylock failed - make sure we correct for
 * having decremented the count.
 */
int __down_trylock(struct semaphore * sem)
{
	int sleepers;
	unsigned long flags;

	spin_lock_irqsave(&semaphore_lock, flags);
	sleepers = sem->sleepers + 1;
	sem->sleepers = 0;

	/*
	 * Add "everybody else" and us into it. They aren't
	 * playing, because we own the spinlock.
	 */
	if (!atomic_add_negative(sleepers, &sem->count))
		wake_up(&sem->wait);

	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&semaphore_lock, flags);
	return 1;
}

/* rw mutexes
 * Implemented by Jakub Jelinek (jakub@redhat.com) based on
 * i386 implementation by Ben LaHaise (bcrl@redhat.com).
 */

extern inline int ldstub(unsigned char *p)
{
	int ret;
	asm volatile("ldstub %1, %0" : "=r" (ret) : "m" (*p) : "memory");
	return ret;
}

#define DOWN_VAR				\
	struct task_struct *tsk = current;	\
	DECLARE_WAITQUEUE(wait, tsk);

void down_read_failed_biased(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
{
	DOWN_VAR

	add_wait_queue(&sem->wait, &wait);	/* put ourselves at the head of the list */

	for (;;) {
		if (!ldstub(&sem->read_not_granted))
			break;
		set_task_state(tsk, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
		if (sem->read_not_granted)
			schedule();
	}

	remove_wait_queue(&sem->wait, &wait);
	tsk->state = TASK_RUNNING;
}

void down_write_failed_biased(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
{
	DOWN_VAR

	add_wait_queue_exclusive(&sem->write_bias_wait, &wait); /* put ourselves at the end of the list */

	for (;;) {
		if (!ldstub(&sem->write_not_granted))
			break;
		set_task_state(tsk, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
		if (sem->write_not_granted)
			schedule();
	}

	remove_wait_queue(&sem->write_bias_wait, &wait);
	tsk->state = TASK_RUNNING;

	/* if the lock is currently unbiased, awaken the sleepers
	 * FIXME: this wakes up the readers early in a bit of a
	 * stampede -> bad!
	 */
	if (sem->count >= 0)
		wake_up(&sem->wait);
}

/* Wait for the lock to become unbiased.  Readers
 * are non-exclusive. =)
 */
void down_read_failed(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
{
	DOWN_VAR

	__up_read(sem); /* this takes care of granting the lock */

	add_wait_queue(&sem->wait, &wait);

	while (sem->count < 0) {
		set_task_state(tsk, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
		if (sem->count >= 0)
			break;
		schedule();
	}

	remove_wait_queue(&sem->wait, &wait);
	tsk->state = TASK_RUNNING;
}

/* Wait for the lock to become unbiased. Since we're
 * a writer, we'll make ourselves exclusive.
 */
void down_write_failed(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
{
	DOWN_VAR

	__up_write(sem);	/* this takes care of granting the lock */

	add_wait_queue_exclusive(&sem->wait, &wait);

	while (sem->count < 0) {
		set_task_state(tsk, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
		if (sem->count >= 0)
			break;  /* we must attempt to acquire or bias the lock */
		schedule();
	}

	remove_wait_queue(&sem->wait, &wait);
	tsk->state = TASK_RUNNING;
}

void __rwsem_wake(struct rw_semaphore *sem, unsigned long readers)
{
	if (readers) {
		/* Due to lame ldstub we don't do here
		   a BUG() consistency check */
		sem->read_not_granted = 0;
		wake_up(&sem->wait);
	} else {
		sem->write_not_granted = 0;
		wake_up(&sem->write_bias_wait);
	}
}